One idea, one quote, one question. 90 seconds.
The Idea
You’ve been in an argument where you knew, in the middle of it, exactly what you should stop saying. You knew the right move was to take a breath and let the other person finish. And you kept going anyway. You understood what to do. You just couldn’t do it in the moment. There’s a real gap between understanding something and being able to perform it, and it’s wider than most people realize.
In 2018, two researchers at the University of Chicago, Michael Kardas and Ed O’Brien, published a study that measured this. They had people watch a video of someone throwing darts at a target. Some watched once. Others watched twenty times. Before throwing any darts themselves, both groups estimated how well they’d do. The people who watched twenty times were significantly more confident. When they actually threw the darts, there was no difference in performance. The extra watching had built confidence without building any actual skill. They thought watching it a bunch of times meant they could do it.
That study was about a motor task, and I don’t want to overstretch it into a theory of everything. But Kier Gaines, a licensed therapist and the author of It All Starts When You Do, described something on the podcast that I think lands in the same territory. He used an example I keep going back to. He told me I could see his face clearly, every detail, but that didn’t mean I could draw it. His point was that this is what happens with emotional skills all the time. You can know perfectly well what not to say in an argument. You can understand that the right thing to do is pause when you’re upset. But understanding what a pause should look like is one thing. Being able to actually produce one when your chest is tight and your heart rate is up takes practice, and the only way to get that practice is to do it badly for a while in real situations.
I think this changes what it means to be stuck. When you know the right thing to do and still can’t do it, the natural move is to go find better advice. A better book, a better podcast, a clearer explanation. But if you already understand the concept, consuming more of it isn’t going to close the gap. The gap closes when you start practicing in situations where it actually counts, which is uncomfortable, and that’s the part most people keep trying to skip.
Quote
“Our deeds determine us, as much as we determine our deeds.” George Eliot, Adam Bede, 1859
She published her first novel under a pen name. The line is about the way action shapes identity: you become what you practice, whether you chose the practice carefully or stumbled into it.
Question
What do you already understand well enough that the next step isn’t more reading?
Listen
Kier Gaines: A Therapist Explains Why You’re Still Unhappy After Getting Everything You Wanted. The drawing example is the moment I built this newsletter around, but the conversation goes much further. Kier gets into why the urge to resolve an argument right now is usually about wanting relief from your own anxiety rather than actually fixing the disagreement, and why getting everything you thought you wanted can leave you feeling emptier than before.
Read
Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning by Peter C. Brown, Henry L. Roediger III, and Mark A. McDaniel. Three researchers spent years studying how people actually retain and apply what they learn. Their finding is that the methods most people rely on, rereading, reviewing, watching demonstrations, feel productive but produce the least lasting change. The book is about what works instead, and most of it comes down to the kind of difficult, uncomfortable retrieval practice that nobody wants to do first.
If you love this content (please share it), but also check out my Podcast, and connect with me on YouTube / Twitter.
— Scott